Participatory methods in school health promotion Az érintettek bevonására épülő beavatkozások

Main Article Content

Zsófia Kollányi
Melinda Várfi

Abstract

Participatory methods are used in the design process of health promotion programs in many parts of the world. The essence of the method is to involve the target group of a program as well as other stakeholders in the development process of the program itself, beginning with the problem assessment phase. The programs developed this way can rely on more realistic and precise problem definitions that are more in line with the target group’s perception of reality; develop interventions that are better suited to these and to the available resources and limitations; and enjoy a greater commitment of those involved both to the program and in general to overcoming the problem itself. Therefore, participatory programs can be equal competitors to programs designed in a non-participatory, expert-based process in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. In addition, the participation process itself can initiate a number of positive changes in local communities, which themselves can have an impact on health status: the empowerment of citizens with little or no power and, in general, the promotion of a say in shaping public affairs as a democratic right. Participatory programs, however, can differ significantly depending on the initial timing of the involvement in the decision-making process, as well as the method and the ultimate goal of the involvement. According to scientific experience, the participatory process can be more effective if the stakeholders are involved as early as possible in the process, in a way that allows interactions between the stakeholders to the greatest extent possible, and with the honest intention of actual empowerment of people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kollányi, Z., & Várfi, M. (2023). Participatory methods in school health promotion: Az érintettek bevonására épülő beavatkozások. Iskolakultúra, 33(1-2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.14232/ISKKULT.2023.1-2.31
Section
Study

Funding data

References

Abma, T., Lips, S., & Schrijver, J. (2020). Sowing Seeds to Harvest Healthier Adults: The Working Pronciples and Impact of Participatory Health Research with Children in a Primary Scool Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(451). doi:doi:10.3390/ijerph17020451

Allender, S., Orellana, L., Crooks, N., Bolton, K., Fraser, P., Dwirght Brown, A., . . . Strugnell, C. (2021). Four-Year Behavioral, Health-Related Quality of Life, and BMI Outcomes from a Cluster Randomized Whole of Systems Trial of Prevention Strategies for Childhood Obesity. Obesity, 29(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23130

Bagnall, A.-M., Radley, D., Jones, R., Gately, P., Nobles, J., Van Dijk, M., . . . Sahota, P. (2019). Whole systems approaches to obesity and other complex public health challenges: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 19(1). doi:doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6274-z

Beierle, T. (1999). Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review, 16(3-4), 75-103.

Blowers, A., Boersema, J., & Martin, A. (2005). Experts, decision making and deliberative democracy. Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 1-3. doi:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15693430500111793

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010

de Jong, M., Tijhuis, Y., Koelen, M., & Wagemakers, A. (2022). Intersectoral collaboration in a Dutch community health promotion programme: building a coalition and networks. Health Promotion International. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab207

de Jong, M., Wagemekers, A., & Koelen, M. (2019). Study protocol: evaluation of a community health promotion program in a socioeconomically deprived city district in the Netherlands using mixed methods and guided by action research. BMC Public Health, 19(72).

Dorner, T., Nunes, L., & Zeegers Paget, D. (dátum nélk.). E-Collection: Health promotion and the need for a multisectoral approach. European Journal of Public Health. Forrás: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/pages/health_promotion

Haldane, V., Chuah, F., Srivastava, A., Singh, S., Koh, G., Seng, C., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2019). Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLoS One, 14(5). doi:doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112

Hargreaves Heap, S. (2004). A note on participatory decision-making and rationality. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 457-467.

Harting, J., Kruithof, K., Ruijter, L., & Stronks, K. (2022). Participatory research in health promotion: a critical review and illustration of rationales. Health Promotion International, 37(Issue Supplement_2), ii7-ii20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac016

Koivusalo, M. (2010). The state of Health in All policies (HiAP) in the European Union: potential and pitfalls. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.102020

Kollányi, Zsófia – Várfi, Melinda (2021): Részvételi módszerek. In: Pipicz, Márton – Terebessy, András – Vitrai, József (szerk.): Útmutató a gyermekek egészségének javítására megalakuló Partneri Együttműködés számára. Egészségfejlesztés 62(1).

Marent, B., Forster, R., & Nowak, P. (2012). Theorizing participation in health promotion: A literature review. Social Theory & Health, 188-207. doi: doi:10.1057/sth.2012.2

Pan Canadian Joint Consortium for School Health. (2010). Stakeholder Engagement for Improved School Policy: Development and Implementation. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 101(Supplement 2), S21-S24.

Poletta, F. (2016). Participatory enthusiasms: a recent history of citizen engagement initiatives. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 231-246. doi:DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1213505

Rifkin, S. (2009). Lessons from community participation in health programmes: a review of the post Alma-Ata experience. International Health, 1(1), 31-36.

Sain, M. (2010). Segédlet a közösségi tervezéshez. Budapest: VÁTI Nonprofit Kft.

Simovska, V. (2011). Case Study of a Participatory Health-Promotion Intervention in School. Democracy and Education, 20(1), 1-10.

Strobl, H., Ptack, K., Töpfer, C., Sygusch, R., & Tittlbach, S. (2020). Effects of a Participatory Scool-Based Intervention on Students' Health-Related Knowledge and Understanding. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(122). doi:doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00122

Surowiecki, J. (2007). A tömegek bölcsessége. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.

Szántó, Richárd (2012). Társadalmi részvétel Magyarországon - Siker vagy kudarc? Kovász, 33-53.

Tasmanian Government. (dátum nélk.). Your Care, Your Say: consumer, carer and community engagement A guide to engagement techniques. Forrás: Tasmanian Government Department of Health Website: https://www.dhhs.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/76283/Toolkit_December_2010_finalised.pdf

White, S. (2000). Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. In J. Pierce, Development, NGOs, and civil society. Oxford: Oxfam GB.

WHO. (1978). Declaration of Alma-Ata.

WHO. (1986). The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, Switzerland.

WHO. (2014). Health in All Policies - Helsinki Statement - Framework for Country Action. Helsinki, Finland: World Health Organization.

WHO. (2016). Flagship Report 2016 - Open Mindsets - Participatory Leadership for Health. Forrás: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/251458/9789241511360-eng.pdf;jsessionid=CB056037C069927B9E52F1C84EB47455?sequence=1