Login or Register to make a submission.

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Authors can submit their papers via the website of the nCOGNITO journal. The paper must not have been previously published and the author must not have submitted the manuscript to another journal. The manuscript must be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please name the file without accentuation as follows: start date of title (e.g. esthetictension_20210618.docx).

To submit a paper, you must register on the journal's website. After successful registration, you must log in with the username and password provided. You can then submit your paper by clicking on "Submissions" in the navigation bar under "Information" on the journal's website.

When submitting a paper, please upload the following information and documents:

Name, affililation, contact information of the author(s)

Address in Hungarian and English:

Abstract in English and Hungarian (<150 words)

English and Hungarian keywords (<8)

Acknowledgement/support (optional)

FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

Length: 20,000 - 40,000 characters including spaces

Name(s) of author(s), affiliation(s), contact details in the article itself NOT REQUIRED DUE TO THE DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW.

No citations in footnotes; footnotes are for comments only.

References have to be provided as in-text references as follows: (Bentley et al. 1929, 57). In the case of multiple references, please use semicolons to separate them; for repeated references, please use: (ibid. 58).

In references, please use the following abbreviations (see Bentley et al. 1929, 57), (cf. Bentley et al. 1929, 57)

Please avoid using special characters («») and replace them with simple symbols (" or ' for a quotation within a quotation).

Quotations should always be marked with quotation marks, not just italics.

Please mark your translation as follows: (author’s translation)

Bibliographic data should be complete, with as much information as possible, including the DOI where applicable

Please collect the bibliographic data, preferably using reference management software (e.g., Citavi, Endnote, Zotero), and include the references of the literature used as an exported text file in bibtex format with the submitted texts. The process of exporting bibtex for the above-mentioned applications can be found at the following links:

Citavi:
https://www1.citavi.com/sub/manual5/en/exporting_to_bibtex.html

Endnote:

https://libguides.usask.ca/c.php?g=218034&p=1458583

Zotero:

https://libguides.usask.ca/c.php?g=218034&p=1446406

 

If the author does not use a citation management system, please provide complete bibliographic information at the end of the text.

REVIEW PROCESS

The submitted manuscript will be reviewed by an expert peer reviewer. nCOGNITO uses double-blind reviewing, i.e. the reviewer does not know the name of the author and the author does not know the name of the reviewer. The evaluation is based on predefined criteria and is carried out using a review form. We therefore ask our authors not to make their name clear in the name of the document, the abstract or in the text of the paper. The evaluation will be sent electronically to the author by the editors without mentioning the name of the referee.

In the case of a positive review, the paper will be published; in the case of a negative review, the editors will send the manuscript for a second review. If the second review is positive, the editors decide whether to accept the paper. In the case of two negative reviews, the paper will not be published in a revised version.