Managing Intertextuality in Ennodius’ Corpus The Case of 1V. (= dict. 1H.) Dictio Ennodi diaconi in natale Laurenti Mediolanensis episcopi

Main Article Content

Martina Cofano

Abstract

‘There is too much literature between reality and him’, said Labriolle: this seems such an adequate statement for Ennodius‘ corpus, since it is normal to stumble upon references or quotations by other authors, either pagan or Christian ones. This paper takes into account Ennodius 1V. (= dict. 1H.) as a case study and aims at examining in detail which works and authors Ennodius uses in order to arrange one dedication. The declamation has been divided in five thematic sections; each shows a different percentage of intertextual categories such as clear reference, self-quotation, altered reference and word collocation. Through statistical evidence, the author of this paper has thought back on Ennodius‘ overall technique in making rhetorics: a good way of paying homage to the summi and the minores, or the easiest way to bundle up quotes and so to earn an entire piece of literature?

Article Details

How to Cite
Cofano, M. (2023). Managing Intertextuality in Ennodius’ Corpus: The Case of 1V. (= dict. 1H.) Dictio Ennodi diaconi in natale Laurenti Mediolanensis episcopi. Sapiens Ubique Civis, 4, 261–290. https://doi.org/10.14232/suc.2023.4.261-290
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Martina Cofano, University of Erlangen–Nuremberg

Martina Cofano is a PhD student in Medieval Latin and Neo-Latin at Friederich- Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and a research partner of PoBLAM Project. Past research interests have focused on rhetorics and grammar, especially the devices of silence in Terence’s drama such as aposiopesis and ellipsis. From a philological point of view, Cofano studied the case of BUB ms. 2083, a palimpsest stored in the Bologna University Library, hypothesizing a position in Laelius’ stemma codicum. Cofano is currently working on the reception of rhetorics in Ennodius’ corpus of controversiae.